Connecting Metrics to Activities and Outcomes

Outcomes are created through doing the right activities. Data is only a proxy for that activity and a metric is a synthesis of lots of data points. Metrics are valuable, but always have a skeptical view of proxies for performance, especially with growth.

D. Brown Management Profile Picture
Share

 

Article Image

 

 

Remember that deeply understanding the activity by either doing it, or through rigorous work observation is where it all starts. Understanding how the activity is connected to outcomes is the foundation. 

When it comes to training and development, studying the activity, collecting the data, and synthesizing that data into metrics, especially trends over time and ratios that put it into context is far more valuable than just being presented the synthesized data.


 

Remember that we are all in the process of working our way up the Knowledge Management Pyramid in some way. Skipping steps leaves major holes in our Situational Awareness and therefore puts decision making at risk. This is one of the areas where Scoreboards and Scorecards fail to deliver results

The metrics used on scoreboards and scorecards were often first developed by someone at a higher level who:

  1. Understood the connection between the activities and the outcomes expected
  2. Understood how to collect the data that represented the activities.
  3. Understood how that data was synthesized into the metric.
  4. Knew what that metric should be as compared to what and when.
  5. Could quickly unpack that synthesized metric into its component data and activities.
  6. Understood what actions to take (or not) based on that metric and deeper investigation.
  7. Build this metric into a clear accountability in a job role description – “Bring in projects at or under budget.”
  8. Built this metric into a great automated information system that displays that metric quickly to everyone who needs to know it.

 

To someone new who is learning and developing up the organization, they won’t have all this background and experience. 

  1. They will understand the accountability. 
  2. They will see the metric. 
  3. They won’t make consistently good decisions that improve outcomes.

 

Something as simple as JTD cost doesn’t even include all the same things depending on the contractor. JTD cost is only relevant if we know:

  1. Total budget and
  2. Current JTD percentage complete so we can 
  3. Compare our JTD cost to where we should be and
  4. What action to take if required including deeper investigation.

 

Jeff Bezos who built an exceptionally data-driven company describes how important having a skeptical view of these proxies for performance is (short video clip)

 

 

Charles Duhigg gives great examples of this in Chapter 8 (Absorbing Data) from Better, Faster, Smarter

 

 

 



Related Training

Contractor Scoreboard: Key Results and Leading Activities (Disciplined Execution)
Defining what you want in quantifiable outcomes is extremely difficult. It's 10X harder to define those outcomes throughout the whole company from field to CEO. Defining the leading activities that create those outcomes is another 10X more difficult.
Building the 1000X Contractor
The craft is the foundation of the construction industry - installation delivers final value for the project owner. Aligning craft talent to build a project is difficult. Building a contracting business that consistently delivers projects is 10X harder.
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) and Contractor Growth
A responsibility matrix is a simple but powerful tool for helping everyone on a project and in the company see who is responsible for what. With a few added columns, it can easily indicate when, what tools, and link to the "how-to" procedures.