Project Delivery - CM at Risk

The Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) delivery model combines Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build.

D. Brown Management Profile Picture
Share

The best elements of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build are combined while eliminating many of the negatives.

CM at Risk: Project Delivery Methods - Definition of CM at Risk and pros and cons.

The CM role is critical for all project delivery methods acting on behalf of the Project Owner and controlling the project’s timeline, cost, and quality within a defined scope. This is known as the Project Management Triangle.  

CMAR integrates the role of the Construction Manager (CM) and the Contractor (GC) while the Project Owner still contracts separately with the Architect.  

The CM+GC combination leverages their depth of constructability knowledge and resources, working hands-on with the Architect and Project Owner from the very initial Programming and Schematic phases.  

The contracts typically have a fixed fee, open-book on costs, a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), and a cost-savings sharing incentive.

This allows the Project Owner to retain both direct control over the design as well as flexibility for rapidly evolving project scopes. The tighter integration of design and construction leads to faster delivery.  

CMAR is one of the most frequently used methods for the ENR Top 400.  

Key downsides include the difficulty in selecting a CM with the best qualifications and the Architect not accepting input from the CM.  

In some situations, the integration of the roles can be challenging when it comes to decisions that require balancing the needs of the Project Owner with the needs of the Contractor, which is why selection is so crucial for success.


Project Delivery - CM at Risk
The preferred project delivery method. There is a reason 100 of ENR's Top 400 General Contractors use CMAR as the project delivery method for over 75% of their work. Leverage CMAR as part of your growth strategy....

Project Delivery - CM at Risk
The preferred project delivery method. There is a reason 100 of ENR's Top 400 General Contractors use CMAR as the project delivery method for over 75% of their work. Leverage CMAR as part of your growth strategy....

Observe, Hypothesize, and Experiment
Contractors would run much better, including improved field productivity, if they applied the simple lesson we all learned around middle-school science class: Stop debating and start experimenting.
Impacted Productivity - Fighting Back
Fighting back effectively against labor productivity impacts will significantly improve project outcomes including customer satisfaction if handled properly. There are four interrelated aspects to effectively fighting back.
Levels of Design / Development / Detail - Beyond just Design
Contractors can improve business results by applying many of the same processes and vocabulary to their business that the industry is applying to projects. Consider how the different Levels of Detail (LOD) could be applied to your planning processes.